Reproducible Analyses

 

Self-reported checklists and quality scoring tools in radiomics: a meta-research

Objective To evaluate the use of reporting checklists and quality scoring tools for self-reporting purposes in radiomics literature. Methods Literature search was conducted in PubMed (date, April 23, 2023). The radiomics literature was sampled at …

Small telescopes Detectability and the evaluation of replication results.

This article introduces a new approach for evaluating replication results. It combines effect-size estimation with hypothesis testing, assessing the extent to which the replication results are consistent with an effect size big enough to have been …

SnapShot: Reporting practices for publishing results with human PSCs and tissue stem cells

This checklist is intended to help scientists, reviewers, and editors prepare and assess manuscripts for inclusion of critical details relevant to work with pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) and tissue stem cells (TSCs) with the goal of increasing the …

Social Sciences Research Methods Centre Replication Workshop

This workshop will introduce students to the process of reproducing published work. Replicating other scholars’ work is an essential tool for becoming familiar with methods, learning to select suitable models, and getting a chance to publish early …

Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences Perspectives on Robust and Reliable Science

A paper about social, behavioural economic perspective on reproducible science

SPSP experts - open science

A video about open science, pre-registration etc.

Star wars: The empirics strike back

Using 50,000 tests published in the AER, JPE, and QJE, we identify a residual in the distribution of tests that cannot be explained solely by journals favoring rejection of the null hypothesis. We observe a two-humped camel shape with missing …

Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science

A blog about statistics and open science

Stereotype threat

A podcast about stereotype threat and replication

Supporting robust research on adult emotional development by considering context

A criterion for high quality science is to produce findings that are robust and replicable across studies. A potential hinderance to successful replication however is context dependency. To formally address issues of context dependency, context has …