Definition: A tongue-in-cheek expression intended to raise awareness of the lack of diverse voices in open science (Bahlai, Bartlett, Burgio et al. 2019; Onie, 2020), in addition to the presence of behavior and communication styles that can be toxic or exclusionary. Importantly, not all bros are men; rather, they are individuals who demonstrate rigid thinking, lack self-awareness, and tend towards hostility, unkindness, and exclusion (Pownall et al., 2021; Whitaker & Guest, 2020). They generally belong to dominant groups who benefit from structural privileges. To address #bropenscience, researchers should examine and address structural inequalities within academic systems and institutions.
References: Reference (s): Guest (2017), Whitaker and Guest (2020), & Pownall et al. (2021)
Drafted and Reviewed by: Zoe Flack, Magdalena Grose-Hodge, Helena Hartmann, Bethan Iley, Tamara Kalandadze, Adam Parker, Charlotte R. Pennington, Flávio Azevedo, Bradley Baker, Mahmoud Elsherif
Note that we are currently working on an automated mechanism to link references cited above with their full-length version that can be found at https://forrt.org/glossary/references with all references used so far.