双盲同行评审 [Double-blind peer review]
定义: 双盲同行评审是指由合格专家对研究成果进行评估，在此过程中作者与评审专家双方身份均相互保密。“这种方式隐去了作者身份及其所属机构信息，理论上可消除因专业声誉、性别、种族及机构背景产生的偏见，使评审者能够避免主观倾向而仅关注论文本身的学术价值”（Tvina et al., 2019）。然而与所有同行评审方式一样，双盲评审亦非完美无缺，对于某些深耕细分领域的研究人员而言，完全实现身份匿名往往非常困难。
相关术语: Ad hominem bias, Affiliation bias, Anonymous review, Masked review, Open peer review, Peer review, Single-blind peer review, Traditional peer review, Triple-Blind peer review
参考文献:
- Largent, E. A., & Snodgrass, R. T. (2016). Blind peer review by academic journals. In C. T. Robertson & A. S. Kesselheim (Eds.), Blinding as a solution to bias: Strengthening biomedical science, forensic science, and law (pp. 75–95). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802460-7.00005-X
- Tvina, A., Spellecy, R., & Palatnik, A. (2019). Bias in the peer review process: can we do better? Obstetrics & Gynecology, 133(6), 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003260
原稿作者: Mahmoud Elsherif
审阅者: Bradley Baker, Helena Hartmann, Meng Liu, Emma Norris
翻译者: AI-driven translation tool "TransFlow" (developed by Jinbiao Yang and COSN OpenTransfer team)
译稿审阅者: Xuejun Ryan Ji, Liangjie Chen, Ruoting Liu, Shuxian Jin