文献综述 [Literature Review]
定义: 研究人员在开展新课题前，通常会系统梳理相关领域的研究文献，以期深入理解目标效应与现象，了解理论与证据的之间的关联性，或探究现有研究成果和主张中的共性结论与研究趋向。根据研究问题和文献范围的不同，文献综述可采取不同的形式。为了确定某一领域的范围和核心概念，研究者可进行范围文献综述。系统综述旨在检索并综述所有相关文献，以获得最准确和最无偏的现有文献观点。非系统或聚焦文献综述能够从与研究问题相关的一系列选定研究中汇总信息，但由于容易受到偏见（例如，研究者偏见）的影响，这类综述并不常见（Siddaway et al., 2019）。
相关术语: Evidence synthesis, Meta-research, Narrative reviews, Systematic reviews
参考文献:
- Huelin, R., Iheanacho, I., Payne, K., & Sandman, K. (2015). What’s in a name? Systematic and non-systematic literature reviews, and why the distinction matters. The Evidence Forum, 34–37. Retrieved from https://www.evidera.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Whats-in-a-Name-Systematic-and-Non-Systematic-Literature-Reviews-and-Why-the-Distinction-Matters.pdf
- Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
- Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149
- Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803
原稿作者: Marta Topor
翻译者: AI-driven translation tool "TransFlow" (developed by Jinbiao Yang and COSN OpenTransfer team)
译稿审阅者: Xinyu Wang, Liangjie Chen, Ruoting Liu, Shuxian Jin