Bropenscience
Definition: A tongue-in-cheek expression intended to raise awareness of the lack of diverse voices in open science (Bahlai, Bartlett, Burgio et al. 2019; Onie, 2020), in addition to the presence of behavior and communication styles that can be toxic or exclusionary. Importantly, not all bros are men; rather, they are individuals who demonstrate rigid thinking, lack self-awareness, and tend towards hostility, unkindness, and exclusion (Pownall et al., 2021; Whitaker & Guest, 2020). They generally belong to dominant groups who benefit from structural privileges. To address #bropenscience, researchers should examine and address structural inequalities within academic systems and institutions.
Related terms: Diversity, Inclusion, Intersectionality, Open Science
References:
- Guest, O. [@o_guest]. (2017). Thanks! Hopefully this thread & many other similar discussions & blogs will help make it less Bropen Science and more Open Science. hides . Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/871675631062458368
- Whitaker, K., & Guest, O. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33, 34â37.
- Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., Darda, K. M., Tang, K. T. Y., Carmichael-Murphy, P., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526â539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255 Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03616843211029255
Originally drafted by: Zoe Flack
Reviewed by: Magdalena Grose-Hodge, Helena Hartmann, Bethan Iley, Tamara Kalandadze, Adam Parker, Charlotte R. Pennington, FlĂĄvio Azevedo, Bradley Baker, Mahmoud Elsherif