Literature Review

Definition: Researchers often review research records on a given topic to better understand effects and phenomena of interest before embarking on a new research project, to understand how theory links to evidence or to investigate common themes and directions of existing study results and claims. Different types of reviews can be conducted depending on the research question and literature scope. To determine the scope and key concepts in a given field, researchers may want to conduct a scoping literature review. Systematic reviews aim to access and review all available records for the most accurate and unbiased representation of existing literature. Non-systematic or focused literature reviews synthesise information from a selection of studies relevant to the research question although they are uncommon due to susceptibility to bias es (e.g. researcher bias; Siddaway et al., 2019).

Related terms: Evidence synthesis, Meta-research, Narrative reviews, Systematic reviews

Reference: Huelin et al., (2015); Munn et al., (2018); Pautasso (2013); Siddaway et al. (2019)

Drafted and Reviewed by: Marta Topor, Jamie P. Cockcroft, Mahmoud Elsherif, Helena Hartmann, FlĂĄvio Azevedo, Meng Liu, Charlotte R. Pennington

We are currently working to link the references directly. For now, the complete reference list can be viewed here.