Definition: A questionable research practice termed ‘Hypothesizing After the Results are Known’ (HARKing). “HARKing is defined as presenting a post hoc hypothesis (i.e., one based on or informed by one’s results) in a research report as if it was, in fact, a priori” (Kerr, 1998, p. 196). For example, performing subgroup analyses, finding an effect in one subgroup, and writing the introduction with a ‘hypothesis’ that matches these results.

Related terms: <a href='/glossary/analytic-flexibility/'>Analytic Flexibility</a>, <a href='/glossary/confirmatory-analyses/'>Confirmatory analyses</a>, <a href='/glossary/exploratory-data-analysis/'>Exploratory data analysis</a>, Fudging, <a href='/glossary/garden-of-forking-paths/'>Garden of forking paths</a>, <a href='/glossary/p-hacking/'>P-hacking</a>, Questionable Research Practices or Questionable Reporting Practices (QRPs)

References: Kerr (1998), & Nosek and Lakens (2014)

Drafted and Reviewed by: Beatrix Arendt, Matt Jaquiery, Charlotte R. Pennington, Martin Vasilev, Flávio Azevedo

Note that we are currently working on an automated mechanism to link references cited above with their full-length version that can be found at https://forrt.org/glossary/references with all references used so far.