About this resource

    Type of resources
    Reading
    Education level(s)
    College / Upper Division (Undergraduates), Graduate / Professional
    Primary user(s)
    Student, Teacher, Librarian
    Subject area(s)
    Career and Technical Education, Life Science
    Language(s)
    English
    Cluster
    Transparency and Reproducibility in Computation and Analysis
    Last updated
    15 September 2026

    Consolidated Reporting Guidelines for Prognostic and Diagnostic Machine Learning Models (CREMLS)

    Open this resource

    Level College / Upper Division (Undergraduates), Graduate / Professional · For Student, Teacher, Librarian · Language English

    Abstract

    The number of papers presenting machine learning (ML) models that are being submitted to and published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research and other JMIR Publications journals has steadily increased. Editors and peer reviewers involved in the review process for such manuscripts often go through multiple review cycles to enhance the quality and completeness of reporting. The use of reporting guidelines or checklists can help ensure consistency in the quality of submitted (and published) scientific manuscripts and, for example, avoid instances of missing information. In this Editorial, the editors of JMIR Publications journals discuss the general JMIR Publications policy regarding authors’ application of reporting guidelines and specifically focus on the reporting of ML studies in JMIR Publications journals, using the Consolidated Reporting of Machine Learning Studies (CREMLS) guidelines, with an example of how authors and other journals could use the CREMLS checklist to ensure transparency and rigor in reporting.

    Keywords Reporting Guidelines · Machine Learning · Predictive Models · Diagnostic Models · Prognostic Models · Artificial Intelligence · Editorial Policy