About this resource

    Type of resources
    Primary Source, Reading
    Education level(s)
    College / Upper Division (Undergraduates), Graduate / Professional, Career / Technical, Adult Education
    Primary user(s)
    Student, Teacher, Librarian
    Subject area(s)
    Applied Science, Arts and Humanities, Business and Communication, Career and Technical Education, Education, English Language Arts, History, Law, Life Science, Math & Statistics, Physical Science, Social Science
    Language(s)
    English
    Cluster
    Academic Structures and Institutions
    Last updated
    9 November 2026
    Primary SourceReading

    Open peer review, pros and cons from the perspective of an early career researcher

    By Tania Henriquez

    Open this resource

    Level College / Upper Division (Undergraduates), Graduate / Professional, Career / Technical, Adult Education · For Student, Teacher, Librarian · Language English

    Abstract

    Peer review is considered by many to be a fundamental component of scientific publishing. In this context, open peer review (OPR) has gained popularity in recent years as a tool to increase transparency, rigor, and inclusivity in research. But how does OPR really affect the review process? How does OPR impact specific groups, such as early career researchers? This editorial explores and discusses these aspects as well as some suggested actions for journals.

    Keywords Open Peer Review · Early Career Researcher · Academic Life