About this resource

    Type of resources
    Primary Source, Reading, Paper
    Education level(s)
    College / Upper Division (Undergraduates)
    Primary user(s)
    Student
    Subject area(s)
    Applied Science, Math & Statistics, Social Science
    Language(s)
    English
    Cluster
    Replication and Meta-Research, Conceptual and Statistical Knowledge
    Last updated
    28 May 2020

    Small telescopes Detectability and the evaluation of replication results.

    Open this resource

    Level College / Upper Division (Undergraduates) · For Student · Language English

    Abstract

    This article introduces a new approach for evaluating replication results. It combines effect-size estimation with hypothesis testing, assessing the extent to which the replication results are consistent with an effect size big enough to have been detectable in the original study. The approach is demonstrated by examining replications of three well-known findings. Its benefits include the following: (a) differentiating “unsuccessful” replication attempts (i.e., studies yielding p > .05) that are too noisy from those that actively indicate the effect is undetectably different from zero, (b) “protecting” true findings from underpowered replications, and (c) arriving at intuitively compelling inferences in general and for the revisited replications in particular

    Keywords Reproducibility Crisis and Credibility Revolution