Reading Undergraduate
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution, Replication and Meta-Research
Teaching resources
Open up your teaching. Find, access and reuse materials from a curated collection of 1,473 open scholarship resources.
Filter by type, level and cluster
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Estimating the Unobserved: Hierarchical Bayesian Estimation of Evidence Accumulation Models with Missing or Contaminant Data
Ways of Working, Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Reading Graduate / Professional
Ethnography vs. zombie methodologies: What anthropology can teach psychology about nonreproducibility
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
European Sociological Association journals European Societies and European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology move to diamond open access at the MIT Press
Academic Structures and Institutions
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Evading Open Science: The Black Box of Student Data Collection
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution, Ways of Working, Pre-analysis Planning
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional +2
Evaluating Content-Related Validity Evidence Using a Text-Based Machine Learning Procedure
Conceptual and Statistical Knowledge
Reading Graduate / Professional
Evaluating Registered Reports: A Naturalistic Comparative Study of Article Impact
Pre-analysis Planning
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Evaluating the R-Index and the P-Curve
Conceptual and Statistical Knowledge
Reading Career / Technical
Evaluating What Works
Conceptual and Statistical Knowledge
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional +2
Evaluation of Transparency and Openness Guidelines in Physical Therapy Journals
Replication and Meta-Research, Academic Structures and Institutions
Student guide, Teaching strategy, Podcast Undergraduate
Everything Hertz
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Interactive Career / Technical
EveryTool4U JSON to CSV Converter
Reading Graduate / Professional
Evidence of insufficient quality of reporting in patent landscapes in the life sciences
Research Integrity, Qualitative Research
Reading Undergraduate
Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015
Conceptual and Statistical Knowledge
Reading Undergraduate
Excess Success for Psychology Articles in the Journal Science
Replication and Meta-Research
Reading Undergraduate
Expectations for Replications: Are Yours Realistic?
Replication and Meta-Research
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Experimentation and manipulation with preregistration
Pre-analysis Planning
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional +2
Experimenter as automaton; experimenter as human: Exploring the position of the researcher in scientific research
Qualitative Research
Reading Undergraduate
Experiments with More Than One Random Factor: Designs, Analytic Models, and Statistical Power.
Conceptual and Statistical Knowledge
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional +1
Exploratory Factor Analysis
Conceptual and Statistical Knowledge
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional +2
Exploratory hypothesis tests can be more compelling than confirmatory hypothesis tests
Conceptual and Statistical Knowledge
Reading Adult education
Exploring Pre-registration and Pre-analysis Plans for Qualitative Inference
Pre-analysis Planning
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Exploring regulatory flexibility to create novel incentives to optimize drug discovery
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Activity Undergraduate, Adult education
Express Entry Invited Candidates: Reproducibility Lab (2026)
No resources match these filters.
Remove a filter or try a broader search term. If something is missing from the collection, suggest a resource.
Missing a resource?
Suggest a resource through our form
How the collection grew
FORRT’s curated resources database now hosts over 1,400 open science materials, thanks to key partnerships. Initially boosted by over 60% by the Open Science Knowledge Base ( see also OSKB’s OER commons page)— a Center for Open Science (COS) initiative. Later, our collection grew by about a quarter through contributions from JUST-OS, increasing resources from 1,140 to 1,402. OSKB’s work involved almost 300 hours (valued at €10,000) and JUST-OS’s work involved 150 hours (valued around €5,000), reflecting significant effort and dedication. COS, OSKB, JUST-OS and FORRT forged partnerships to promote open and reproducible research practices, enabling the scientific community to build upon each other’s work and advance knowledge collaboratively. Learn more about it FORRT’s and OSKB’s partnership in the COS’s announcement.