Module Graduate / Professional
Introduction to Power Analyses in R
Conceptual and Statistical Knowledge
Teaching resources
Open up your teaching. Find, access and reuse materials from a curated collection of 1,473 open scholarship resources.
Filter by type, level and cluster
Lecture Graduate / Professional
Introduction to Preprints
Publication Sharing
Module Graduate / Professional
Introduction to R for Geospatial Data
Transparency and Reproducibility in Computation and Analysis, FAIR Data and Materials
Activity Graduate / Professional
Introduction to Research Data Management
FAIR Data and Materials
Video Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Introduction to simulations
Conceptual and Statistical Knowledge
Module Graduate / Professional
Introduction to the Command Line for Economics
Transparency and Reproducibility in Computation and Analysis
Module Graduate / Professional
Introduction to the Command Line for Genomics
Transparency and Reproducibility in Computation and Analysis
Module Graduate / Professional
Introduction to web scraping
FAIR Data and Materials
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Investigating the nature of open science practices across complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine journals: An audit
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Reading Undergraduate
Investigating Variation in Replicability: A “Many Labs” Replication Project
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Reading Undergraduate
Investigation and its discontents: Some constraints on progress in psychological research.
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Reading Undergraduate
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2012). Why science is not necessarily self-correcting. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 645-654.
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
IRCC and ESDC Open Data Field Guide: What Each Canadian Immigration Dataset Actually Counts
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional +2
Is Preregistration Worthwhile?
Pre-analysis Planning
Reading Undergraduate
Is Psychology Suffering From a Replication Crisis? What Does “Failure to Replicate” Really Mean?
Replication and Meta-Research
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Is replication possible in qualitative research? A response to Makel et al. (2022)
Qualitative Research, Conceptual and Statistical Knowledge
Reading Undergraduate
Is the call to abandon p-values the red herring of the replicability crisis?
Conceptual and Statistical Knowledge
Reading Undergraduate
Is the replicability crisis overblown? Three arguments examined
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Reading Undergraduate
Is there a credibility crisis in strategic management research? Evidence on the reproducibility of study findings
Replication and Meta-Research, Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Reading Undergraduate
Is There a Free Lunch in Inference?
Conceptual and Statistical Knowledge
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Issues in the Registration of Clinical Trials
Pre-analysis Planning
Reading Undergraduate
It’s Time to Broaden the Replicability Conversation: Thoughts for and From Clinical Psychological Science
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
It’s time to join the conversation: Visions of the Future for Qualitative Transparency and Openness in Management and Organisation Studies
Conceptual and Statistical Knowledge, Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Joy and rigor in behavioral science
Academic Structures and Institutions, Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
No resources match these filters.
Remove a filter or try a broader search term. If something is missing from the collection, suggest a resource.
Missing a resource?
Suggest a resource through our form
How the collection grew
FORRT’s curated resources database now hosts over 1,400 open science materials, thanks to key partnerships. Initially boosted by over 60% by the Open Science Knowledge Base ( see also OSKB’s OER commons page)— a Center for Open Science (COS) initiative. Later, our collection grew by about a quarter through contributions from JUST-OS, increasing resources from 1,140 to 1,402. OSKB’s work involved almost 300 hours (valued at €10,000) and JUST-OS’s work involved 150 hours (valued around €5,000), reflecting significant effort and dedication. COS, OSKB, JUST-OS and FORRT forged partnerships to promote open and reproducible research practices, enabling the scientific community to build upon each other’s work and advance knowledge collaboratively. Learn more about it FORRT’s and OSKB’s partnership in the COS’s announcement.