Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional +2
Pre-analysis Plans Have Limited Upside, Especially Where Replications Are Feasible
Pre-analysis Planning
Teaching resources
Open up your teaching. Find, access and reuse materials from a curated collection of 1,473 open scholarship resources.
Filter by type, level and cluster
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional +2
Pre-registration and Results-Free Review in Observational and Qualitative Research
Pre-analysis Planning
Reading Undergraduate
Pre-registration in social psychology—A discussion and suggested template
Pre-analysis Planning
Teaching strategy Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Pre-Registration in the Undergraduate Dissertation: A Critical Discussion
Pre-analysis Planning
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Pre-registration of clinical trials is associated with fewer positive findings
Pre-analysis Planning
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional +2
Pre-registration of mathematical models
Pre-analysis Planning
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional +2
Pre-registration: Weighing costs and benefits for researchers
Pre-analysis Planning
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional +2
Pre-registration: Why and How
Pre-analysis Planning
Lesson Graduate / Professional
Pre-results Review in Economics: Lessons Learned from Setting up Registered Reports
Pre-analysis Planning
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Pre Self: what fraction of a journal’s papers are preprinted?
Transparency and Reproducibility in Computation and Analysis, Academic Structures and Institutions
Reading Undergraduate
Prediction Interval: What to Expect When You’re Expecting … A Replication
Conceptual and Statistical Knowledge
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional +2
Preliminary analysis of COVID-19 academic information patterns: a call for open science in the times of closed borders
FAIR Data and Materials
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional +2
Premiering pre-registration at PLOS Biology
Pre-analysis Planning
Activity Graduate / Professional
Preparing code and data for computationally reproducible collaboration and publication: a hands-on workshop
Transparency and Reproducibility in Computation and Analysis, FAIR Data and Materials
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Preregister Your Ethical Redlines: Vulnerable Populations, Policy Engagement, and the Perils of E-Hacking
Pre-analysis Planning
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional +2
Preregistering qualitative research
Qualitative Research, Pre-analysis Planning
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional +2
Preregistering Qualitative Research: A Delphi Study
Qualitative Research, Pre-analysis Planning
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Preregistering, transparency, and large samples boost psychology studies’ replication rate to nearly 90%
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional +2
Preregistration and Incentives
Pre-analysis Planning
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional +2
Preregistration and Registered Reports in Sociology: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Other Considerations
Pre-analysis Planning
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional +2
Preregistration and reproducibility
Pre-analysis Planning
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional +2
Preregistration as a way to limit questionable research practice in advertising research
Pre-analysis Planning
Reading Undergraduate
Preregistration Becoming the Norm in Psychological Science
Pre-analysis Planning
Reading, Student guide Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Preregistration: Definition, Advantages, Disadvantages, and How It Can Help Against Questionable Research Practices
Pre-analysis Planning
No resources match these filters.
Remove a filter or try a broader search term. If something is missing from the collection, suggest a resource.
Missing a resource?
Suggest a resource through our form
How the collection grew
FORRT’s curated resources database now hosts over 1,400 open science materials, thanks to key partnerships. Initially boosted by over 60% by the Open Science Knowledge Base ( see also OSKB’s OER commons page)— a Center for Open Science (COS) initiative. Later, our collection grew by about a quarter through contributions from JUST-OS, increasing resources from 1,140 to 1,402. OSKB’s work involved almost 300 hours (valued at €10,000) and JUST-OS’s work involved 150 hours (valued around €5,000), reflecting significant effort and dedication. COS, OSKB, JUST-OS and FORRT forged partnerships to promote open and reproducible research practices, enabling the scientific community to build upon each other’s work and advance knowledge collaboratively. Learn more about it FORRT’s and OSKB’s partnership in the COS’s announcement.