Reading Undergraduate
Publication pressure and scientific misconduct in medical scientists
Research Integrity, Ways of Working
Teaching resources
Open up your teaching. Find, access and reuse materials from a curated collection of 1,473 open scholarship resources.
Filter by type, level and cluster
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional +2
Publication rate in preclinical research: A plea for preregistration
Pre-analysis Planning
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Publishing in the Open Access and Open Science era
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Activity Graduate / Professional
Python for Harvesting Data on the Web
FAIR Data and Materials
Module Graduate / Professional
Python for Humanities
Transparency and Reproducibility in Computation and Analysis, FAIR Data and Materials
Data or tool, Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
QDR Data for Teaching
FAIR Data and Materials
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional +1
Qualitative Open Science Practices
FAIR Data and Materials
Lesson Graduate / Professional
Qualitative Research Using Open Tools
Transparency and Reproducibility in Computation and Analysis, Qualitative Research
Student guide Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional +2
Quality Indicators of Secondary Data Analyses in Special Education Research: A Preregistration Guide
Pre-analysis Planning
Reading Undergraduate
Quality Uncertainty Erodes Trust in Science
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Syllabus Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Quantitative Emerging Practices and Methods in Psychology
Replication and Meta-Research, Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Reading Graduate / Professional
Questionable and Open Research Practices in Education Research
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Questionable Metascience Practices
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Reading Graduate / Professional
Questionable research practices among Italian research psychologists
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Questionable research practices among researchers in the most research-productive management programs
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Questionable research practices following pre-registration
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Reading Graduate / Professional
Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Reading Undergraduate
Questionable Research Practices Revisited
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Module Graduate / Professional
R for Reproducible Scientific Analysis
Transparency and Reproducibility in Computation and Analysis
Module Graduate / Professional
R for Social Scientists
Transparency and Reproducibility in Computation and Analysis, FAIR Data and Materials
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional +1
R Graphics Cookbook: Practical Recipes for Visualizing Data
Transparency and Reproducibility in Computation and Analysis
Module Graduate / Professional
R para Análisis Científicos Reproducibles
Transparency and Reproducibility in Computation and Analysis
Reading Undergraduate
Race to the Bottom: Competition and Quality in Science
Academic Structures and Institutions
Reading Graduate / Professional
Raiders of the lost HARK: a reproducible inference framework for big data science
Conceptual and Statistical Knowledge, Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
No resources match these filters.
Remove a filter or try a broader search term. If something is missing from the collection, suggest a resource.
Missing a resource?
Suggest a resource through our form
How the collection grew
FORRT’s curated resources database now hosts over 1,400 open science materials, thanks to key partnerships. Initially boosted by over 60% by the Open Science Knowledge Base ( see also OSKB’s OER commons page)— a Center for Open Science (COS) initiative. Later, our collection grew by about a quarter through contributions from JUST-OS, increasing resources from 1,140 to 1,402. OSKB’s work involved almost 300 hours (valued at €10,000) and JUST-OS’s work involved 150 hours (valued around €5,000), reflecting significant effort and dedication. COS, OSKB, JUST-OS and FORRT forged partnerships to promote open and reproducible research practices, enabling the scientific community to build upon each other’s work and advance knowledge collaboratively. Learn more about it FORRT’s and OSKB’s partnership in the COS’s announcement.