Reading Graduate / Professional
Reproducible research practices, transparency, and open access data in the biomedical literature, 2015–2017
Replication and Meta-Research
Teaching resources
Open up your teaching. Find, access and reuse materials from a curated collection of 1,473 open scholarship resources.
Filter by type, level and cluster
Student guide, Teaching strategy, Video Undergraduate
Reproducible Research: True or False?
Conceptual and Statistical Knowledge
Module Graduate / Professional
Reproducible Research: Walking the Walk
Transparency and Reproducibility in Computation and Analysis
Module Graduate / Professional
Reproducible Science Curriculum Lesson for Automation
Transparency and Reproducibility in Computation and Analysis
Module Graduate / Professional
Reproducible Science Curriculum Lesson for Literate Programming
Transparency and Reproducibility in Computation and Analysis
Module Graduate / Professional
Reproducible Science Curriculum Lesson for Organization
FAIR Data and Materials
Module Graduate / Professional
Reproducible Science Curriculum Lesson for Publication
Transparency and Reproducibility in Computation and Analysis
Module Graduate / Professional
Reproducible Science Curriculum Lesson for Version Control
Transparency and Reproducibility in Computation and Analysis
Module Graduate / Professional
Reproducible Science Workshop
Transparency and Reproducibility in Computation and Analysis, FAIR Data and Materials
Reading, Interactive Undergraduate
Reproducible statistics for psychologists with R Lab Tutorials
Transparency and Reproducibility in Computation and Analysis
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Reputation Without Practice? A Dynamic Computational Model of the Unintended Consequences of Open Scientist Reputations
Academic Structures and Institutions
Reading Career / Technical
Research and data lessons from a non-academic job
Ways of Working
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Research assessment using a narrow definition of “research quality” is an act of gatekeeping: A comment on Gärtner et al. (2022)
Academic Structures and Institutions
Video Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Research Culture is Broken; Open Science can Fix It
Academic Structures and Institutions
Activity, Lecture, Module Undergraduate
Research Integrity and Open Science I (PSYC123)
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Full course Graduate / Professional
Research Integrity and Responsible Scholarship
Academic Structures and Institutions
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Research Integrity definitions and challenges
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Syllabus Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Research Methods 2020
Conceptual and Statistical Knowledge
Syllabus Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Research Methods in Psychology
Conceptual and Statistical Knowledge
Syllabus Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Research Methods in Social Psychology
Replication and Meta-Research, Conceptual and Statistical Knowledge
Full course, Syllabus Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Research Methods in Social Psychology
Conceptual and Statistical Knowledge
Full course Undergraduate
Research Methods Psychology Summer 2021 - Professor Gernsbacher
Conceptual and Statistical Knowledge
Syllabus Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional +1
Research Methods Syllabi
Conceptual and Statistical Knowledge
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional +2
Research Misconduct
Transparency and Reproducibility in Computation and Analysis, Academic Structures and Institutions
No resources match these filters.
Remove a filter or try a broader search term. If something is missing from the collection, suggest a resource.
Missing a resource?
Suggest a resource through our form
How the collection grew
FORRT’s curated resources database now hosts over 1,400 open science materials, thanks to key partnerships. Initially boosted by over 60% by the Open Science Knowledge Base ( see also OSKB’s OER commons page)— a Center for Open Science (COS) initiative. Later, our collection grew by about a quarter through contributions from JUST-OS, increasing resources from 1,140 to 1,402. OSKB’s work involved almost 300 hours (valued at €10,000) and JUST-OS’s work involved 150 hours (valued around €5,000), reflecting significant effort and dedication. COS, OSKB, JUST-OS and FORRT forged partnerships to promote open and reproducible research practices, enabling the scientific community to build upon each other’s work and advance knowledge collaboratively. Learn more about it FORRT’s and OSKB’s partnership in the COS’s announcement.