Activity, Interactive Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional +2
Teaching resources
Open up your teaching. Find, access and reuse materials from a curated collection of 1,473 open scholarship resources.

Filter by type, level and cluster
Activity, Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Sanctions list data: dates of birth, names and IDs
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Scandal in scientific reform: the breaking and remaking of science
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Reading Undergraduate
Scanning the horizon: towards transparent and reproducible neuroimaging research
Replication and Meta-Research, Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Scholarly Publishing as a Global Endeavor: Leveraging Open Source Software for Bibliodiversity
FAIR Data and Materials
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
School Psychology Annual Journal Update: Revising Open Science Standards
Academic Structures and Institutions
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Schools ‘should teach children how to spot conspiracy theories
Ways of Working
Student guide, Teaching strategy, Podcast Undergraduate
Science and Pseudoscience BBC Radio Talk
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Science for Progress Initiative
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Interactive, Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional +2
Science isn’t Broken
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Full course Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional +1
Science Literacy
Conceptual and Statistical Knowledge
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Science of psychological phenomena and their testing.
Conceptual and Statistical Knowledge
Reading Undergraduate
Science or art? How aesthetic standards grease the way through the publication bottleneck but undermine science.
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Reading Undergraduate
Scientific apophenia in strategic management research: Significance tests & mistaken inference
Replication and Meta-Research, Conceptual and Statistical Knowledge
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Scientific reform, citation politics and the bureaucracy of oblivion
Academic Structures and Institutions
Reading Undergraduate
Scientific Utopia: I. Opening Scientific Communication
Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Reading Graduate / Professional
Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring Incentives and Practices to Promote Truth Over Publishability
Academic Structures and Institutions, Replication Crisis and Credibility Revolution
Reading Undergraduate
Scientists’ Reputations Are Based on Getting It Right, Not Being Right
Academic Structures and Institutions
Reading Graduate / Professional
Secondary Data Preregistration
Pre-analysis Planning, Qualitative Research
Reading Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
Seek and you may (not) find: A multi-institutional analysis of where research data are shared
FAIR Data and Materials
Reading Graduate / Professional
Selective and (mis)leading economics journals: Meta-research evidence
Conceptual and Statistical Knowledge
Reading Graduate / Professional
Self-reported checklists and quality scoring tools in radiomics: a meta-research
Transparency and Reproducibility in Computation and Analysis
Reading Undergraduate
Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences
Replication and Meta-Research
Activity Undergraduate, Graduate / Professional
ShareStats - The open statistics assessment itembank
FAIR Data and Materials
No resources match these filters.
Remove a filter or try a broader search term. If something is missing from the collection, suggest a resource.
Missing a resource?
Suggest a resource through our form
How the collection grew
FORRT’s curated resources database now hosts over 1,400 open science materials, thanks to key partnerships. Initially boosted by over 60% by the Open Science Knowledge Base ( see also OSKB’s OER commons page)— a Center for Open Science (COS) initiative. Later, our collection grew by about a quarter through contributions from JUST-OS, increasing resources from 1,140 to 1,402. OSKB’s work involved almost 300 hours (valued at €10,000) and JUST-OS’s work involved 150 hours (valued around €5,000), reflecting significant effort and dedication. COS, OSKB, JUST-OS and FORRT forged partnerships to promote open and reproducible research practices, enabling the scientific community to build upon each other’s work and advance knowledge collaboratively. Learn more about it FORRT’s and OSKB’s partnership in the COS’s announcement.
