FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

Spatial and Temporal Details in Intentions: A Cue to Detecting Deception

Lara Warmelink, Aldert Vrij, Samantha Mann, Pär Anders Granhag

Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2012. DOI 10.1002/acp.2878

Has this study been replicated?

The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 failed. The earliest on record is from 2018.

Replications

• The first direct replication on using verbal credibility assessment for the detection of deceptive intentions, Kleinberg et al. (2018). Applied Cognitive Psychology. Outcome recorded: failed. The original study found truth-tellers to include more specific time references in their answers. The replication study that closely mimicked the setting, procedure, materials, coding, and analyses found no lie-truth difference for specific time references. Although the power of our replication study was suboptimal (0.77), Bayesian statistics showed evidence in favor of the null hypothesis. Outcome read from the abstract. View paper

Cite this record

Warmelink, L., Vrij, A., Mann, S., & Granhag, P. A. (2012). Spatial and Temporal Details in Intentions: A Cue to Detecting Deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(1), 101–106. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2878

Other studies in the atlas

• Contextual Bias in Verbal Credibility Assessment: Criteria‐Based Content Analysis…
• The first direct replication on using verbal credibility assessment for the detection of…
• A Polymorphism in CALHM1 Influences Ca2+ Homeostasis, Aβ Levels, and Alzheimer's Disease…
• On the limits of language influences on numerical cognition – no inversion effects in…
• Registered Replication Report on Srull and Wyer (1979)
• Imposing cognitive load to elicit cues to deceit: inducing the reverse order technique…

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages