The Actor–Observer Bias and Moral Intuitions: Adding Fuel to Sinnott-Armstrong's Fire
Has this study been replicated?
The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 failed. The earliest on record is from 2018.
Replications
- Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy, Cova et al. (2018). Review of Philosophy and Psychology. Outcome recorded: failed.
Although being descriptively in the same direction than in the results from the original effect, the difference of distribution of yes/no answers between the conditions actor and observer wasnot significant, X²(1, N= 150) = 0.33, p= .56, Φ= .0021.
Outcome read from the abstract. View paper
Cite this record
Nadelhoffer, T., & Feltz, A. (2008). The Actor–Observer Bias and Moral Intuitions: Adding Fuel to Sinnott-Armstrong's Fire. Neuroethics, 1(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-008-9015-7
Other studies in the atlas
Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages