Institutional forces and the written business plan
Has this study been replicated?
The atlas records 1 replication and 1 reproduction of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 successful, 1 failed. The earliest on record is from 2014.
Replications
- Data replication and extension: A study of business planning and venture-level performance, Honig & Samuelsson (2014). Journal of Business Venturing Insights. Outcome recorded: successful.
Overall, H&K's initial results were upheld over an extended time frame of eight additional years, a significant finding given the debate regarding the relevance of planning outcomes
Read from results. View paper
Reproductions
- Revisiting the influence of institutional forces on the written business plan: a replication study, Hopp et al. (2018). Management Review Quarterly. Outcome recorded: computational issues, robustness challenges.
Computational: we note tiny distortions by rounding errors in the original study in the second and third digit after the comma (numbers in the original have been rounded down almost exclusively). As a first result, we can confirm that the H&K study is fully replicable. However, we noted that some discrepancies exist between the original study, the data used, and the Swedish PSED userfile. Several observations had different values for key dependent and independent…
Read from Methods. View paper
Cite this record
Honig, B., & Karlsson, T. (2004). Institutional forces and the written business plan. Journal of Management, 30(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2002.11.002
Other studies in the atlas
Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages