FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

Rebate versus matching: does how we subsidize charitable contributions matter?

Catherine C Eckel, Philip J Grossman

Journal of Public Economics, 2003. DOI 10.1016/s0047-2727(01)00094-9

Has this study been replicated?

The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 successful.

Replications

• Subsidy Schemes and Charitable Contributions: A Closer Look, Davis et al. (2005). Outcome recorded: successful. replicates and "stress tests" a recent finding by Eckel and Grossman (2003) that matching subsidies generate substantially higher Charity Receipts than theoretically comparable rebate subsidies. View paper

Other studies in the atlas

• Subsidy Schemes and Charitable Contributions: A Closer Look
• Idiosyncratic Risk Matters!
• Does Idiosyncratic Risk Really Matter?
• An Accurate Measurement of the Crowd-out Effect, Income Effect, and Price Effect for Char…
• The robustness of Kingma's crowd-out estimate: Evidence from new data on contributions to…
• A Theory of Career Mobility

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages