FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

Rebate versus matching: does how we subsidize charitable contributions matter?

Catherine C Eckel, Philip J Grossman

Journal of Public Economics, 2003. DOI 10.1016/s0047-2727(01)00094-9

Has this study been replicated?

The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 successful. The earliest on record is from 2005.

Replications

• Subsidy Schemes and Charitable Contributions: A Closer Look, Davis et al. (2005). Experimental Economics. Outcome recorded: successful. replicates and "stress tests" a recent finding by Eckel and Grossman (2003) that matching subsidies generate substantially higher Charity Receipts than theoretically comparable rebate subsidies. Outcome read from the abstract. View paper

Cite this record

Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (2003). Rebate versus matching: does how we subsidize charitable contributions matter? Journal of Public Economics, 87(3-4), 681–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0047-2727(01)00094-9

Other studies in the atlas

• Administrative Unit Proliferation
• Thar SHE Blows? Gender, Competition, and Bubbles in Experimental Asset Markets
• Growth and inequality in public good provision
• Social norms and energy conservation
• Coveting Thy Neighbor's Manuafacturing: The Dilemma of State Income Apportionment
• Property rights for the poor: Effects of land titling

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages