The Electoral Implications of Candidate Ambiguity
Has this study been replicated?
The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 failed.
Replications
- SCORE new data replication of Tomz & Van Houweling (2009), Druckman et al. (2026). Outcome recorded: failed.
We did not find a significant probit coefficient associated with risk aversion (z= -.274, p = .784), such that risk-averse respondents were no less likely to prefer an ambiguous candidateto a precise candidate. Therefore, the replication of the relevant claim was unsuccessful according to theSCORE c
Other studies in the atlas
Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages