FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

Who throws good money after bad? Action vs. state orientation moderates the sunk cost fallacy

Marijke van Putten, Marcel Zeelenberg, Eric van Dijk

Judgment and Decision Making, 2010. DOI 10.1017/s1930297500002011

Has this study been replicated?

The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 failed. The earliest on record is from 2021.

Replications

• Does Action vs. State Orientation Really Matter in the Susceptibility to Sunk Cost Fallacy? A Conceptual Replication Study, Galasová & Grežo (2021). Studia Psychologica. Outcome recorded: failed. Eventually, our study failed to replicate the results of Action versus state orientation did not predict the susceptibility to sunk cost fallacy. Outcome read from the abstract. View paper

Cite this record

Putten, M. v., Zeelenberg, M., & Dijk, E. v. (2010). Who throws good money after bad? Action vs. state orientation moderates the sunk cost fallacy. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(1), 33–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500002011

Other studies in the atlas

• The Influence of Poststudy Action Congruency on Memory Consolidation
• Dispositional greed
• Two Bayesian tests of the GLOMOsys Model
• Three Attempts to Replicate the Moral Licensing Effect
• Registered Replication Report
• The burden of secrecy? No effect on hill slant estimation and beanbag throwing

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages