Therapists' attributions for client premature termination: Are they self-serving?
Has this study been replicated?
The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 failed. The earliest on record is from 2021.
Replications
- No self‐serving bias in therapists' evaluations of clients' premature treatment termination: An approximate replication of Murdock et al. (2010), Dandachi‐FitzGerald et al. (2021). Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. Outcome recorded: failed.
Unlike Murdock et al. (2010), we found no overall SSB. However, a stronger need for closure was related to more SSB tendencies (i.e., less endorsement of 'blame therapist' attributions) in the own-client condition (r = −.35, p < .05, r2 = .12), but not in the other-therapist's-client condition (r = .17, p = .27).
Outcome read from the full text. View paper
Cite this record
Murdock, N. L., Edwards, C., & Murdock, T. B. (2010). Therapists' attributions for client premature termination: Are they self-serving? Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 47(2), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019786
Other studies in the atlas
Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages