FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

The replicability of the negative testing effect: Differences across participant populations

Neil W. Mulligan, Katherine A. Rawson, Daniel J. Peterson, Kathryn T. Wissman

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2018. DOI 10.1037/xlm0000490

Has this study been replicated?

This paper is itself a replication attempt. The study it set out to replicate is listed below.

Study replicated

• The negative testing effect and multifactor account, Peterson & Mulligan (2013). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. View paper

Cite this record

Mulligan, N. W., Rawson, K. A., Peterson, D. J., & Wissman, K. T. (2018). The replicability of the negative testing effect: Differences across participant populations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(5), 752–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000490

Other studies in the atlas

• The negative testing effect and multifactor account
• Does testing impair relational processing? Failed attempts to replicate the negative…
• Openness to Experience, Intellect, and Cognitive Ability
• Replication of the Interaction of PRKG1 and Trauma Exposure on Alcohol Misuse in an…
• Six Features Of Medicare Coordinated Care Demonstration Programs That Cut Hospital…
• Testing the Replicability of a Successful Care Management Program: Results from a…

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages