Simple auditory and visual interruptions of a continuous visual tracking task: modality effects and time course of interference
Has this study been replicated?
The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 successful. The earliest on record is from 2023.
Replications
- Speech, Nonspeech Audio, and Visual Interruptions of a Tracking Task: A Replication and Extension of Nees & Sampsell (2021), Nees et al. (2023). Outcome recorded: successful.
Nees and Sampsell previously found that multitasking was superior with nonspeech auditory alerts as compared to visual alerts. In the current experiment, their methods were replicated and extended to include a speech auditory alerts condition. Performance of the on-going tracking task was worse with interruption from visual alerts, and perceived workload also was highest in this condition. (...) The current experiment replicated the results of Nees and Sampsell and extended…
Read from abstract. View paper
Cite this record
Nees, M. A., & Sampsell, N. G. (2021). Simple auditory and visual interruptions of a continuous visual tracking task: modality effects and time course of interference. Ergonomics, 64(7), 879–890. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2021.1873424
Other studies in the atlas
Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages