FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

Comparison Between the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) and the Nonverbal Medical Symptom Validity Test (NV-MSVT) in Adults With Disability Claims

Paul Green

Applied Neuropsychology, 2011. DOI 10.1080/09084282.2010.523365

Has this study been replicated?

The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 successful. The earliest on record is from 2011.

Replications

• Sensitivity of the Test of Memory Malingering and the Nonverbal Medical Symptom Validity Test: A Replication Study, Armistead-Jehle & Gervais (2011). Applied Neuropsychology. Outcome recorded: successful. Overall, results closely matched those of the Green ( in press ) study and extend the evidence that the NV-MSVT possesses better sensitivity to poor effort than the TOMM. Outcome read from the abstract. View paper

Cite this record

Green, P. (2011). Comparison Between the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) and the Nonverbal Medical Symptom Validity Test (NV-MSVT) in Adults With Disability Claims. Applied Neuropsychology, 18(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09084282.2010.523365

Other studies in the atlas

• The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field…
• Correction to Gerber and Green (2000), Replication of Disputed Findings, and Reply to…
• Action video game modifies visual selective attention
• Stratifying Type 2 Diabetes Cases by BMI Identifies Genetic Risk Variants in LAMA1 and…
• Macropartisanship: A Replication and Critique
• Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages