FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

Folk psychological concepts: Causation1

Craig Roxborough, Jill Cumby

Philosophical Psychology, 2009. DOI 10.1080/09515080902802769

Has this study been replicated?

The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 failed. The earliest on record is from 2018.

Replications

• Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy, Cova et al. (2018). Review of Philosophy and Psychology. Outcome recorded: failed. Coded as not replicated: ReplicationSUCCESS = 0 (the project's pre-registered binary indicator of whether the replication met its success criterion). Outcome read from Study dataset (osf.io). View paper

Cite this record

Roxborough, C., & Cumby, J. (2009). Folk psychological concepts: Causation1. Philosophical Psychology, 22(2), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080902802769

Other studies in the atlas

• On gender and philosophical intuition: Failure of replication and other negative results
• Intentional action in folk psychology: An experimental investigation
• After objectivity: an empirical study of moral judgment
• Skill, luck, control, and intentional action
• Surveying Freedom: Folk Intuitions about free will and moral responsibility
• Reading Conflicted Minds: An Empirical Follow-up to Knobe and Roedder

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages