Explaining Deindustrialization: How Affluence, Productivity Growth, and Globalization Diminish Manufacturing Employment
Has this study been replicated?
The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 mixed. The earliest on record is from 2025.
Replications
- SCORE secondary data replication of Kollmeyer (2009), Loomas et al. (2025). Outcome recorded: mixed.
"The coefficient on unbalanced productivity growth is negative… and statistically significant at the 5% level (p = 0.022, two-tailed test). The coefficient on (unbalanced productivity growth)² is positive… and statistically significant… Consequently, this claim was replicated""The coefficient on National Affluence is negative… and statistically significant… The coefficient on (National Affluence)² is negative… and not statistically significant… The coefficient on (National…
Outcome read from OSF report.
Cite this record
Kollmeyer, C. (2009). Explaining Deindustrialization: How Affluence, Productivity Growth, and Globalization Diminish Manufacturing Employment. American Journal of Sociology, 114(6), 1644–1674. https://doi.org/10.1086/597176
Other studies in the atlas
Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages