FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

The Social Roots of the Partisan Gender Gap

B. C. Burden

Public Opinion Quarterly, 2008. DOI 10.1093/poq/nfm056

Has this study been replicated?

The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 failed. The earliest on record is from 2021.

Replications

• Does Measurement Affect the Gender Gap in Political Partisanship?, Krupnikov et al. (2021). Public Opinion Quarterly. Outcome recorded: failed. Contrary to Burden (2008), our data show that measures of partisanship that prime affect do not lead women to be more likely to identify as Republicans. Rather, these measures lead women of both parties to be more likely to identify as independent—a pattern that leaves the partisan gender gap in place, but suggests that both parties may be losing women. Outcome read from the abstract. View paper

Cite this record

Burden, B. C. (2008). The Social Roots of the Partisan Gender Gap. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm056

Other studies in the atlas

• Does Measurement Affect the Gender Gap in Political Partisanship?
• Self-Interest and Public Opinion Toward Smoking Restrictions and Cigarette Taxes
• Self-Interest and Public Opinion Toward Smoking Policies: A Replication and Extension
• Response Scales: Effects of Category Range on Reported Behavior and Comparative Judgments
• Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Part-Whole Question Sequences: A Conversational…
• Misinformation or Expressive Responding?

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages