FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

What Is Beautiful Is Good and More Accurately Understood

Genevieve L. Lorenzo, Jeremy C. Biesanz, Lauren J. Human

Psychological Science, 2010. DOI 10.1177/0956797610388048

Has this study been replicated?

The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 mixed.

Replications

• Is what is beautiful good and still more accurately understood? A replication and extension of Lorenzo et al. (2010), Tissera et al. (2022). Outcome recorded: mixed. These results partially replicate the original findings while also providing new insight: What is beautiful to the beholder is good but is less accurately understood if the target is consensually less attractive. View paper

Other studies in the atlas

• Is what is beautiful good and still more accurately understood? A replication and extensi…
• The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity
• A multilab investigation into the N2pc as an indicator of attentional selectivity: Direct…
• Evaluating the Role of Trust in Consumer Adoption of Mobile Payment Systems: An Empirical…
• Evaluating the Role of Trust in Adoption: A Conceptual Replication in the Context of Open…
• Interdependence with the environment: Commitment, interconnectedness, and environmental b…

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages