What Is Beautiful Is Good and More Accurately Understood
Has this study been replicated?
The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 mixed. The earliest on record is from 2022.
Replications
- Is what is beautiful good and still more accurately understood? A replication and extension of Lorenzo et al. (2010), Tissera et al. (2022). European Journal of Personality. Outcome recorded: mixed.
These results partially replicate the original findings while also providing new insight: What is beautiful to the beholder is good but is less accurately understood if the target is consensually less attractive.
Outcome read from the abstract. View paper
Cite this record
Lorenzo, G. L., Biesanz, J. C., & Human, L. J. (2010). What Is Beautiful Is Good and More Accurately Understood. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1777–1782. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610388048
Other studies in the atlas
Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages