A Tale of Two Types of Perspective Taking
Has this study been replicated?
The atlas records 2 replications of this study. Recorded outcomes: 2 failed. The earliest on record is from 2022.
Replications
- Eleven years of student replication projects provide evidence on the correlates of replicability in psychology, Boyce et al. (2023). Royal Society Open Science. Outcome recorded: failed.
Subjective replication success rating = 0 (failed). The replication report rated each sub-outcome on a 0-1 scale; the row is recorded as failed only when all sub-outcomes equal 0, successful only when all equal 1, and mixed for any value strictly between.
Outcome read from github.com. View paper - Sex differences in social and spatial perspective taking: A replication and extension of Tarampi et al. (2016), Geer & Ganley (2022). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Outcome recorded: failed.
Our replication of Tarampi et al.'s analyses found no difference in females' performance on the tasks; however, when both females and males were included, we found some evidence for better performance in the social and spatial condition. Examining both males' and females' performance in all four conditions, we found that males outperformed females. In addition, participants who completed tasks with spatial information performed better. Findings suggest the difference…
Outcome read from the abstract. View paper
Cite this record
Tarampi, M. R., Heydari, N., & Hegarty, M. (2016). A Tale of Two Types of Perspective Taking. Psychological Science, 27(11), 1507–1516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616667459
Other studies in the atlas
Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages