FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

Ideology and Specific Support for the Supreme Court

Kathryn Haglin, Soren Jordan, Alison Higgins Merrill, Joseph Daniel Ura

Political Research Quarterly, 2020. DOI 10.1177/1065912920950482

Has this study been replicated?

The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 failed. The earliest on record is from 2025.

Replications

• Reevaluating ideological asymmetries in specific support for the Supreme Court, Haglin et al. (2025). Research & Politics. Outcome recorded: failed. We find that asymmetries in the association between Supreme Court approval and Americans' ideological disagreement with the Court have changed substantially and abruptly Outcome read from the abstract. View paper

Cite this record

Haglin, K., Jordan, S., Merrill, A. H., & Ura, J. D. (2020). Ideology and Specific Support for the Supreme Court. Political Research Quarterly, 74(4), 955–969. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912920950482

Other studies in the atlas

• Why Do We Hate Hypocrites? Evidence for a Theory of False Signaling
• Tolerating dissimilar other when primed with death: neural evidence of self-control…
• A Multi-Site Collaborative Study of the Hostile Priming Effect
• Reevaluating ideological asymmetries in specific support for the Supreme Court
• Genome‐Wide Association Study of Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis in North American…
• Uncalculating cooperation is used to signal trustworthiness

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages