FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

Ruminators (Unlike Others) Fail to Show Suppression-Induced Forgetting on Indirect Measures of Memory

Paula T. Hertel, Amaris Maydon, Ashley Ogilvie, Nilly Mor

Clinical Psychological Science, 2018. DOI 10.1177/2167702618785339

Has this study been replicated?

The atlas records 1 reproduction of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 mixed.

Reproductions

• Reproduction (with author data & code): Hertel et al. (2018, Clinical Psychological Science), Loomas et al. (2022). OSF. Outcome recorded: computationally reproducible, robustness not checked. Computational: "Based on these criteria, the claim did reproduce." Table shows exact match: F=6.204 vs 6.20, eta²=0.114 vs 0.11, p=0.016 vs 0.016, all within precise reproduction criteria. Outcome read from Computational: Claim evaluation / TABLE 0. View paper

Cite this record

Hertel, P. T., Maydon, A., Ogilvie, A., & Mor, N. (2018). Ruminators (Unlike Others) Fail to Show Suppression-Induced Forgetting on Indirect Measures of Memory. Clinical Psychological Science, 6(6), 872–881. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618785339

Other studies in the atlas

• Validation of DNA-Based Prognostic Testing to Predict Spinal Curve Progression in…
• Lateral Eye Movements Increase False Memory Rates
• Lateral Eye Movements Do Not Increase False-Memory Rates: A Failed Direct-Replication…
• Helping or Harming? The Effect of Trigger Warnings on Individuals With Trauma Histories
• Mechanisms of Selective Attention in Generalized Anxiety Disorder
• Interpersonal Problems and Negative Affect in Borderline Personality and Depressive…

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages