FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

When Choices Are Mistakes

Kirby Nielsen, John Rehbeck

American Economic Review, 2022. DOI 10.1257/aer.20201550

Has this study been replicated?

The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 mixed.

Replications

• Reconsidering mistakes: reproduction and replication of Nielsen and Rehbeck (2022) (No, Bayle et al. (2026). Outcome recorded: mixed. We find robust evidence that individuals express a desire to follow canonical axioms, but perceive violations as mistakes only for a subset of them-specifically, IIA and Transitivity. In contrast, we find no evidence that violations of Independence, First-Order Stochastic Dominance, Branching, or Co

Other studies in the atlas

• Reducing political polarization in the United States with a mobile chat platform
• Why Don't Firms Hire Young Workers During Recessions?
• Who Chooses Commitment? Evidence and Welfare Implications
• Race, Performance, and Baseball Card Values
• Debiased Estimators in High-Dimensional Regression: A Review and Replication of Javanmard…
• Selection bias, vote counting, and money-priming effects: A comment on Rohrer, Pashler, a…

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages