Risk and Religion: An Explanation of Gender Differences in Religiosity
Has this study been replicated?
The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 mixed. The earliest on record is from 2018.
Replications
- Risk Preference Theory and Gender Differences in Religiousness: A Replication and Extension, Hoffmann (2018). Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. Outcome recorded: mixed.
The results provide modest support for risk preference theory: the introduction of risk preferences diminishes the female‐male difference in religiousness among youth in all three data sets.
Outcome read from the abstract. View paper
Cite this record
Miller, A. S., & Hoffmann, J. P. (1995). Risk and Religion: An Explanation of Gender Differences in Religiosity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 34(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.2307/1386523
Other studies in the atlas
Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages