Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: Evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture
Has this study been replicated?
The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 failed. The earliest on record is from 2016.
Replications
- Nogo Stimuli Do Not Receive More Attentional Suppression or Response Inhibition than Neutral Stimuli: Evidence from the N2pc, PD, and N2 Components in a Spatial Cueing Paradigm, Barras & Kerzel (2016). Frontiers in Psychology. Outcome recorded: failed.
In particular, our results do not support the hypothesis that nogo-cues entail inhibition because we failed to replicate the difference between neutral and nogo cues that was reported by Anderson and Folk (2012).
Outcome read from the abstract. View paper
Cite this record
Anderson, B. A., & Folk, C. L. (2012). Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: Evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(6), 1183–1198. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0325-9
Other studies in the atlas
Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages