FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

Flexible goal imitation: Vicarious feedback influences stimulus-response binding by observation

Carina Giesen, Kerstin Scherdin, Klaus Rothermund

Learning & Behavior, 2016. DOI 10.3758/s13420-016-0250-1

Has this study been replicated?

The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 failed. The earliest on record is from 2026.

Replications

• Negative Feedback Does Not Reverse Observationally Acquired Binding and Retrieval Effects: A Failed Replication, Franke et al. (2026). Journal of Cognition. Outcome recorded: failed. In our replication, we found no evidence for a modulatory influence of feedback on oSRBR effects. A meta-analysis with the data from Giesen et al. (2017) and our experiment revealed no significant modulatory effect of vicarious feedback on retrieval of observationally acquired SR bindings. Outcome read from the abstract. View paper

Cite this record

Giesen, C., Scherdin, K., & Rothermund, K. (2016). Flexible goal imitation: Vicarious feedback influences stimulus-response binding by observation. Learning & Behavior, 45(2), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-016-0250-1

Other studies in the atlas

• Figure-Ground Asymmetries in the Implicit Association Test (IAT)
• Negative Feedback Does Not Reverse Observationally Acquired Binding and Retrieval…
• Grounding language in action
• A pre-registered, multi-lab non-replication of the action-sentence compatibility effect…
• Cognitive capacity limitations and Need for Cognition differentially predict…
• Reproduction (with author data & code): Sandra & Otto (2018, Cognition)

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages