FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

Attitudes Towards Reference and Replaceability

Christopher Grau, Cynthia L. S. Pury

Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2013. DOI 10.1007/s13164-013-0162-3

Has this study been replicated?

The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 failed. The earliest on record is from 2018.

Replications

• Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy, Cova et al. (2018). Review of Philosophy and Psychology. Outcome recorded: failed. Coded as not replicated: ReplicationSUCCESS = 0 (the project's pre-registered binary indicator of whether the replication met its success criterion). Outcome read from Study dataset (osf.io). View paper

Cite this record

Grau, C., & Pury, C. L. S. (2013). Attitudes Towards Reference and Replaceability. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 5(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-013-0162-3

Other studies in the atlas

• Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy
• The Lesson of Bypassing
• Further Analysis of the Response Deprivation Hypothesis: Application of the…
• Increasing Toy Engagement via Response Disequilibrium Theory: A Systematic Replication
• Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers?
• We are all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers: Successful replication…

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages