FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

Evidence against subliminal anchoring: Two close, highly powered, preregistered, and failed replication attempts

Lukas Röseler, Astrid Schütz, Pia A. Blank, Marieluisa Dück, Sabine Fels, Jana Kupfer, Linda Scheelje, Christian Seida

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2021. DOI 10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104066

Has this study been replicated?

This paper is itself a replication attempt, targeting 2 studies, listed below.

Studies replicated

• Subliminal anchoring: The effects of subliminally presented numbers on probability estimates, Reitsma-van Rooijen & L. Daamen (2006). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. View paper
• Subliminal anchoring: Judgmental consequences and underlying mechanisms, Mussweiler & Englich (2005). Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. View paper

Cite this record

Röseler, L., Schütz, A., Blank, P. A., Dück, M., Fels, S., Kupfer, J., Scheelje, L., & Seida, C. (2021). Evidence against subliminal anchoring: Two close, highly powered, preregistered, and failed replication attempts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 92, 104066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104066

Other studies in the atlas

• Many Labs 5: Registered Replication of Förster, Liberman, and Kuschel's (2008) Study 1
• No Evidence for the Affective Expectation Model: Replication of Geers and Lassiter (2003)
• A Multilab Preregistered Replication of the Ego-Depletion Effect
• The Effect of Variety on Perceived Quantity
• Rich false memories of autobiographical events can be reversed
• Double misinformation: Effects on eyewitness remembering

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages