FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

The evaluability bias in charitable giving: Saving administration costs or saving lives?

Lucius Caviola, Nadira Faulmüller, Jim. A. C. Everett, Julian Savulescu, Guy Kahane

Judgment and Decision Making, 2014. DOI 10.1017/s1930297500006185

Has this study been replicated?

The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 successful.

Replications

• Does the evaluability bias hold when giving to animal charities?, Spiteri (2022). Outcome recorded: successful. I found that the overhead ratio is an easier attribute to evaluate than cost-effectiveness in separate evaluation, and, in joint evaluation, people allocate donations based on cost-effectiveness. View paper

Other studies in the atlas

• Does the evaluability bias hold when giving to animal charities?
• Moderating Loss Aversion: Loss Aversion Has Moderators, But Reports of its Death are Grea…
• Loss aversion (simply) does not materialize for smaller losses
• A replication of "an experimental test of the expectancy‐disconfirmation theory of citize…
• Poverty Impedes Cognitive Function
• The duality of poverty: a replication of Mani et al. (2013) in Colombia

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages