Defaults, Framing and Privacy: Why Opting In-Opting Out1
Has this study been replicated?
The atlas records 2 replications of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 failed, 1 mixed. The earliest on record is from 2022.
Replications
- Defaults versus framing: Revisiting Default Effect and Framing Effect with replications and extensions of Johnson and Goldstein (2003) and Johnson, Bellman, and Lohse (2002), Chandrashekar et al. (2023). Meta-Psychology. Outcome recorded: failed.
We, however, failed to replicate the findings of Johnson et al. (2002)'s study; we did not find evidence for a default effect.
Outcome read from the abstract. View paper - Default effects: Replications and Extensions of Johnson & Goldstein (2003) and Johnson, Bellman, & Lohse (2002), Chandrashekar et al. (2022). Outcome recorded: mixed.
We, however, failed to replicate the findings of Johnson et al. (2002)'s study; we did not find evidence for a default effect. We did, however, find a framing effect: participants who read a positively-framed scenario consented to receive health-related information at a higher rate than participants who read a negatively framed scenario. We also conducted a conceptual replication of Johnson et al. (2002) that was based on an organ-donation scenario, but this attempt failed…
Outcome read from the abstract. View paper
Cite this record
Johnson, E. J., Bellman, S., & Lohse, G. L. (2002). Defaults, Framing and Privacy: Why Opting In-Opting Out1. Marketing Letters, 13(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015044207315
Other studies in the atlas
Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages