Models of supervisory job performance ratings
Has this study been replicated?
The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 successful. The earliest on record is from 2000.
Replications
- Replication and Extension of Models of Supervisory Job Performance Ratings, Lance & Bennett, Jr. (2000). Human Performance. Outcome recorded: successful.
Results indicated that (a) effects of ability and experience were linear, not interactive; (b) different conceptualizations of "experience" play somewhat different causal roles in the determination of job knowledge, job proficiency, and supervisory ratings; (c) general support for the mediational roles of job knowledge and job proficiency; and (d) supervisory ratings reflect both technical (task-based) and motivational (contextual) aspects of performance.
Outcome read from the abstract. View paper
Cite this record
Borman, W. C., White, L. A., Pulakos, E. D., & Oppler, S. H. (1991). Models of supervisory job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 863–872. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.863
Other studies in the atlas
Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages