Artful paltering: The risks and rewards of using truthful statements to mislead others
Has this study been replicated?
The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 successful. The earliest on record is from 2023.
Replications
- Eleven years of student replication projects provide evidence on the correlates of replicability in psychology, Boyce et al. (2023). Royal Society Open Science. Outcome recorded: successful.
"The key finding that individuals evaluate those who palter and those who lie by commission as being equally unethical was successfully replicated. In the original study, the contrast between the paltering and lying conditions in simple linear regression assessing the effect of condition on ratings of the unethicality of the Buyer indicated a non-significant p-value (p = .91); this p-value was also non-significant in the present replication (p = .90)."
Outcome read from Conclusion section in report. View paper
Cite this record
Rogers, T., Zeckhauser, R., Gino, F., Norton, M. I., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2017). Artful paltering: The risks and rewards of using truthful statements to mislead others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(3), 456–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000081
Other studies in the atlas
Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages