FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

Can research participants comment authoritatively on the validity of their self-reports of mind wandering and task engagement? A replication and extension of Seli, Jonker, Cheyne, Cortes, and Smilek (2015)

Matt E. Meier

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2018. DOI 10.1037/xhp0000556

Has this study been replicated?

This paper is itself a replication attempt. The study it set out to replicate is listed below.

Study replicated

• Can research participants comment authoritatively on the validity of their self-reports of mind wandering and task engagement?, Seli et al. (2015). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. View paper

Cite this record

Meier, M. E. (2018). Can research participants comment authoritatively on the validity of their self-reports of mind wandering and task engagement? A replication and extension of Seli, Jonker, Cheyne, Cortes, and Smilek (2015). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(10), 1567–1585. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000556

Other studies in the atlas

• Replication: Do coaches stick with what barely worked? Evidence of outcome bias in sports
• Sweet taste preferences and experiences predict prosocial inferences, personalities, and…
• Is There a Positive Association Between Working Memory Capacity and Mind Wandering in a…
• Economic Transition and Growth: A Replication
• Distractor rejection in visual search breaks down with more than a single distractor…
• Object-based target templates guide attention during visual search

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages