Composite faces are not (necessarily) processed coactively: A test using systems factorial technology and logical-rule models
Has this study been replicated?
The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 mixed. The earliest on record is from 2023.
Replications
- Composite Schematic Faces are Processed Analytically, Cheng & Little (2023). Outcome recorded: mixed.
While the results are mostly in line with the composite face task results reported in Cheng et al. (2018), there are some key differences between the experiments. In that paper, they found the hallmark of holistic processing with both upright and inverted faces whereas with the schematic composite faces, we found a hallmark for holistic processing only in the upright and not the inverted face conditions. Nevertheless, these findings allow confirmation that our composite…
Outcome read from the full text. View paper
Cite this record
Cheng, X. J., McCarthy, C. J., Wang, T. S. L., Palmeri, T. J., & Little, D. R. (2018). Composite faces are not (necessarily) processed coactively: A test using systems factorial technology and logical-rule models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(6), 833–862. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000479
Other studies in the atlas
Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages