FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

Thinking about God increases acceptance of artificial intelligence in decision-making

Mustafa Karataş, Keisha M. Cutright

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2023. DOI 10.1073/pnas.2218961120

Has this study been replicated?

The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 failed. The earliest on record is from 2024.

Replications

• Does thinking about God increase acceptance of artificial intelligence in decision-making?, Moore et al. (2024). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Outcome recorded: failed. Fig. 1 shows that our replications produced weaker results than those reported in the original studies. In our replications, the effect of God salience on AI reliance is not statistically different from zero (Studies 1, 2a, 2b, 3, and 5 produced effect sizes, measured by r, of 0.03, 0.02, 0.03, 0.002, and 0.01, respectively—in contrast to the original effect sizes reported for each of the respective studies of 0.19, 0.15, 0.14, 0.11, and 0.19). Fig. 1 omits a conceptual… Outcome read from the abstract. View paper

Cite this record

Karataş, M., & Cutright, K. M. (2023). Thinking about God increases acceptance of artificial intelligence in decision-making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(33). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2218961120

Other studies in the atlas

• When Your World Must Be Defended: Choosing Products to Justify the System
• Sharing of misinformation is habitual, not just lazy or biased
• Distortions of mind perception in psychopathology
• Unconscious processing dissociates along categorical lines
• Testing the effects of Facebook usage in an ethnically polarized setting
• Female teachers' math anxiety affects girls' math achievement

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages