The Dark Side of Scarcity Promotions: How Exposure to Limited-Quantity Promotions Can Induce Aggression
Has this study been replicated?
The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 failed. The earliest on record is from 2021.
Replications
- Empirical audit and review and an assessment of evidentiary value in research on the psychological consequences of scarcity, O'Donnell et al. (2021). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Outcome recorded: failed.
The ANOVA revealed no effect of perceived threat (PHigh Threat = .30, SD = .24 vs. PLow Threat = .34, SD = .26, F(1, 385) = 2.65, p = .105, partial eta- 42 squared = .007) and no effect of scarcity promotion (PScarcity = .33, SD = .25 vs. PControl = .32, SD = .25, F(1, 385) = 0.04, p = .843, partial eta-squared = .000). In addition, the hypothesized interaction was not significant (F(1, 385) = 0.01, p = .945, partial eta-squared = .000).
Outcome read from Appendix p. 42. View paper
Cite this record
Kristofferson, K., McFerran, B., Morales, A. C., & Dahl, D. W. (2016). The Dark Side of Scarcity Promotions: How Exposure to Limited-Quantity Promotions Can Induce Aggression. Journal of Consumer Research, ucw056. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucw056
Other studies in the atlas
Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages