Scarcity Frames Value
Has this study been replicated?
The atlas records 2 replications of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 failed, 1 successful. The earliest on record is from 2021.
Replications
- Empirical audit and review and an assessment of evidentiary value in research on the psychological consequences of scarcity, O'Donnell et al. (2021). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Outcome recorded: failed.
A 2 (scarcity condition) × 2 (account condition) analysis of variance revealed no significant interaction, F(1, 203) = 1.69, p = .19.
Outcome read from the abstract. View paper - Eleven years of student replication projects provide evidence on the correlates of replicability in psychology, Boyce et al. (2023). Royal Society Open Science. Outcome recorded: successful.
Subjective replication success rating = 1 (successful). The replication report rated each sub-outcome on a 0-1 scale; the row is recorded as failed only when all sub-outcomes equal 0, successful only when all equal 1, and mixed for any value strictly between.
Outcome read from github.com. View paper
Cite this record
Shah, A. K., Shafir, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2015). Scarcity Frames Value. Psychological Science, 26(4), 402–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614563958
Other studies in the atlas
Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages