FLoRA Replication Atlas › Browse

When Meat Gets Personal, Animals' Minds Matter Less

Jared Piazza, Steve Loughnan

Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2016. DOI 10.1177/1948550616660159

Has this study been replicated?

The atlas records 1 replication of this study. Recorded outcomes: 1 mixed. The earliest on record is from 2020.

Replications

• Do Animals' Minds Matter Less, When Meat Gets Personal? Replications of Piazza and Loughnan (2016) in China, Tian et al. (2020). Social Psychological and Personality Science. Outcome recorded: mixed. We replicated the original three studies in China. Study 1 finds that the intelligence information about a fictional animal does not affect moral standing judgment or hunting decisions, inconsistent with the original study. By manipulating the intelligence of animals in one's culture (pig) versus in other cultures (tapir or trablan), Study 2 consistently finds that intelligence information does not influence moral standing judgment only for pigs. --- "Why Was the Original… Outcome read from the full text. View paper

Cite this record

Piazza, J., & Loughnan, S. (2016). When Meat Gets Personal, Animals' Minds Matter Less. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(8), 867–874. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616660159

Other studies in the atlas

• Don't Mind Meat? The Denial of Mind to Animals Used for Human Consumption
• Neural mechanisms of attentional shifts due to irrelevant spatial and numerical cues
• The Primacy Effect in Impression Formation: Some Replications and Extensions
• Embodying Power
• Context Moderates Affirmation Effects on the Ethnic Achievement Gap
• Wholesome Foods and Wholesome Morals?

Failed replications · Successful replications · All browse pages