Appendix B — Author Contributions

This handbook contains some chapters that were authored by a subset of the team and reviewed by the rest and other chapters that were co-written by almost the entire team.

No.	Author	Contribution (CRediT)	(Co-)written Parts and Chapters	Affiliation
1	Röseler, Lukas* ✉	Conceptualization, Project Administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing	Foundations, The Reproduction and Replication Process, Communicating and Publishing, Conclusion and Checklist	Münster Center for Open Science, University of Münster
2	Wallrich, Lukas* ✉	Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing	Foundations, The Reproduction and Replication Process, Communicating and Publishing, Conclusion and Checklist	Birkbeck Business School, University of London
3	Hartmann, Helena	Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing	Foundations, The Reproduction and Replication Process, Communicating and Publishing, Conclusion and Checklist	Department for Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University Hospital Essen
4	Altegoer, Luisa	Writing – review & editing	Field-Specific Replication Challenges: An example from MRI research	University of Münster, Institute for Translational Psychiatry
5	Boyce, Veronica	Writing – review & editing	Foundations, The Reproduction and Replication Process, Communicating and Publishing, Conclusion and Checklist	Department of Psychology, Stanford University
6	Brohmer, Hilmar	Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing	On the Perks and Challenges of Organizing a Multi-Lab Study	Graz Open Science Initiative, University of Graz, Graz & Empirical Social Sciences, Vorarlberg University of Applied Science, Dornbirn
7	Field, Sarahanne M.	Writing – review & editing	Choosing the Target Study	Department of Pedagogy, University of Groningen
8	Goltermann, Janik	Writing – review & editing	Field-Specific Replication Challenges: An example from MRI research	University of Münster, Institute for Translational Psychiatry
9	Hüffmeier, Joachim	Writing – review & editing	Planning and Conducting Reproductions and Replications	TU Dortmund University
10	Moser, Victoria	Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing	Key Takeaways	Münster Center for Open Science, University of Münster
11	Pennington, Charlotte R.	Writing – review & editing	Foundations, The Reproduction and Replication Process, Communicating and Publishing, Conclusion and Checklist	School of Psychology, Aston University, Birmingham
12	Pittelkow, Merle-Marie	Writing – review & editing	Choosing the Target Study	Berlin Institute of Health at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
13	Schöch, Christof	Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing	Challenges for Repeatability Research in Computational Literary Studies	Trier Center for Digital Humanities, University of Trier
14	Silverstein, Priya	Writing – review & editing	Foundations, The Reproduction and Replication Process, Communicating and Publishing, Conclusion and Checklist	Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra; Institute for Globally Distributed Open Research and Education
15	van Ravenzwaaij, Don	Writing – review & editing	Choosing the Target Study	Department of Psychology, University of Groningen
16	Wagge, Jordan R.	Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing	Teaching Replication	School of Psychology, Avila University
17	Willoughby, Lisa M.	Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing	Teaching Replication	Department of Psychology, Saint Louis University
18	Azevedo, Flavio	Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing	Foundations, The Reproduction and Replication Process, Communicating and Publishing, Conclusion and Checklist	University of Utrecht, Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science

*shared first authorship

C Potential Conflicts of Interest

Note — Preliminary Version 0.1

This is a preliminary version. Feedback welcome: lukas.roeseler@uni-muenster.de or GitHub.

A large proportion of the authors are members of FORRT, an organization dedicated to integrating open and reproducible science into higher education. LR, LW, FA, and JG are inaugural editors of the in-development journal Replication Research (https://replicationresearch.org). Besides their conviction of the value of replications, their current project’s success relies on researchers conducting reproductions and replications. LR is the managing director of an institutional open science center and proponent of repetitive research. The authors declare that they have no further potential conflicts of interest.

D Funding

Note — Preliminary Version 0.1

This is a preliminary version. Feedback welcome: lukas.roeseler@uni-muenster.de or GitHub.

LR received funding from the University of Münster and the ‘Landesinitiative openaccess.nrw’. LW and LR received funding from ‘UK Research and Innovation’. LW, HH, and FA received funding from the ‘Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek’. JG received funding by ‘Innovative Medizinische Forschung’ (IMF) of the medical faculty of the University of Münster (GO122301). HH was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) - Project-ID 422744262 - TRR 289 (gefördert durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) - Projektnummer 422744262 - TRR 289).

E Acknowledgments

Note — Preliminary Version 0.1

This is a preliminary version. Feedback welcome: lukas.roeseler@uni-muenster.de or GitHub.

This work is an initiative from The Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training (FORRT; https://forrt.org), and all core-team authors are active members of FORRT’s Replication Hub (https://forrt.org/replication-hub).

We thank Patrick Smela for valuable ideas on defining replication success and Abel Brodeur for suggestions about definitions and the relationship between reproducibility and replicability.